In a significant legal development, YSRC rebel MP Kanumuri Raghu Ramakrishna Raju has mounted a challenge against the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) penalty order, which slapped a Rs.40 crore fine on him. The ED accuses Raju of violating the Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema) through his company, Ind Barath Sun Energy Pvt Ltd (IBSEPL). The ED’s order, issued on November 3, alleges improper handling of foreign direct investment (FDI) transactions.
Chronicle of Alleged Violations
The ED’s penalty order revolves around transactions dating back to 2010 when IBSEPL received Rs. 202 crore in FDI from Strategic Energy Investments Ltd, Mauritius (SEIL). The subsequent transfer of Rs.200 crore into Ind Barath Energy (Utkal) Ltd is at the centre of the alleged FEMA violations, according to the ED. The authority contends that these transfers were in violation of FEMA provisions.
Also Read: Rebel YSRCP MP Raghu Ramakrishna Raju Challenges Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister In Supreme Court
Legal Notice and Court Proceedings
Responding to the ED’s penalty, Kanumuri Raghu Ramakrishna Raju has approached the Telangana High Court seeking justice. The court, in turn, has issued a notice to the special director of the Enforcement Directorate in Chennai. This notice demands an explanation of the ED’s position within one week. The legal battle intensifies as both sides prepare to present their arguments in court.
MP’s Defence: Operating Company Status and Resignation from IBSEPL
In defence, Raju contends that IBSEPL is an operating cum investing company and, therefore, doesn’t require approval under the FDI policy. Furthermore, he asserts that he ceased to be a director of IBSEPL in 2013, distancing himself from the alleged violations. The intricacies of IBSEPL’s operations and compliance with FDI regulations will likely be scrutinized during the legal proceedings.
Court’s Decision on Interim Relief and Next Hearing
Justice Surepalli Nanda, presiding over the case, has refrained from granting interim relief without hearing from the Enforcement Directorate. The court has scheduled the case for further hearing on December 1, allowing time for the ED to present its case. The legal battle promises to unfold with both sides making their arguments in the pursuit of a fair and just resolution.
ED’s Allegations, MP’s Defence, and the Legal Battlefield
As the legal tussle between YSRC rebel MP Kanumuri Raghu Ramakrishna Raju and the Enforcement Directorate ensues, the case presents a complex web of allegations, defences, and legal intricacies. The court’s decision will likely hinge on the interpretation of FEMA provisions, the status of IBSEPL as an operating company, and the actions of Raju as its former director. The outcome of this legal battle will not only impact Raju’s financial liabilities but may also set precedents for how FDI transactions are scrutinized and penalized in the future.
