In a legal tangle, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, led by Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur, issued notices on November 29 to the Chief Secretary of the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Union Cabinet Secretary, and others in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The petitioner, K. Venkaiah, a Mangalagiri-based journalist, alleges that government officials’ involvement in the YSR Congress Party’s ‘Why A.P. Needs Jagan’ program is an inappropriate use of state funds for political gain.
The petitioner contends that money from the State exchequer is being spent on the program, which essentially glorifies Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. The PIL challenges the involvement of government officials and employees, arguing that they are being compelled to participate in what amounts to a political activity. The petitioner’s advocates assert that charge and show-cause memos are being issued to those defying instructions, leading to a violation of relevant service rules.
Can Govt Policy Can Be Pushed In Individual's Name?: High Court Asks AP Govt In PIL Challenging 'Why Andhra Needs Jagan' Campaignhttps://t.co/g76eCSq7Sf
— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) November 29, 2023
Assertions and defences
Government Pleader -V. Maheswara Reddy defends the program, stating it aims to create awareness about the development and welfare schemes implemented by the government. The court takes note of arguments and reflects on the nature of governments highlighting achievements and informing citizens about welfare schemes. However, the court acknowledges the potential concern when government policies are pushed in the name of a single person.
The petitioner claims that the ‘Why A.P. Needs Jagan’ program is a political campaign funded by the government but not under the official capacity of Chief Minister Y.S Jagan Mohan Reddy. It alleges that the ruling party is using public funds for its political gain and instructing government officials and public servants to support the program. The PIL seeks appropriate action against state respondents involved in patronizing the ruling party.
Also Read: Supreme Court Notifies Andhra Pradesh CID’s Appeal Against Naidu’s Regular Bail
Program Funding and Lack of Transparency
The program was announced at a press conference, followed by the government’s allocation of Rs. 20 crores through G.O. No. 7 of 13.10.2023. The petitioner highlights the lack of transparency, noting that the G.O. was not made available online or on the official state website. Efforts to obtain the G.O. were futile, raising questions about the allocation of public funds.
Legal Proceedings and Government Employees
Ongoing proceedings before the District Collector of Kurnool reveal punitive show-cause notices issued to government employees who did not participate in the program. The petitioner argues that the promotion of an individual with government funds and the mandating of government employees in a political campaign are unacceptable practices.
High Court’s Directive and Future Proceedings
While the petitioner sought an interim order, the court was not inclined to grant immediate relief. The matter is posted for further hearing after four weeks. The court directs the State to file a reply, acknowledging the need to strike a balance between promoting welfare schemes and avoiding undue promotion in the name of an individual.
As the legal drama unfolds, the High Court’s intervention sheds light on the complexities of government-funded programs with potential political implications. The proceedings, marked by allegations of misuse of public funds and concerns about political campaigns, await further examination and resolution in the coming weeks.
[…] Also Read: Judicial Spotlight On ‘Why A.P. Needs Jagan’ As Notices Fly To Chief Secretary And Sajjala In PI… […]